For your Role-Playing Desires Outside Shadowbite!

haha yes twilight that was then we actually read it when it wasnt so popular.

me too i read it this past january

yeah then it got so big... then everything went downhill. ....

[xTeamDimitrix] wrote:

yeah then it got so big... then everything went downhill. ....

To the point where it's a pattern in history we pray would be averted when the next big things come along[i said things, not thing, because it's a part of the whole mess in the first place!]right?

yeah just like harry potter that was so huge but people were looking for something else to obsess over and there twilight was wait a few years something else will come up.

[xTeamDimitrix] wrote:

yeah just like harry potter that was so huge but people were looking for something else to obsess over and there twilight was wait a few years something else will come up.

Except the Potter-World had moderately justified antics[no matter how idiotic!] and the novels were powered by bad-assery, plus a great cast, for that matter, that twilight just...lacked![as the sequels proved!]

The reason i said things, not 'thing', is because i am hoping we can make a difference by letting The Mortal Instruments, Vampire Academy, and Percy Jackson And The Olympians become the next big things, instead of just one of them!

yeah! mortal intruments is a really good series! im pretty sure other series will become movies.

[xTeamDimitrix] wrote:

yeah! mortal intruments is a really good series! im pretty sure other series will become movies.

I just hope that they'll be the ones worth talking about instead of just the twi-drivel, soon.

Lol i know... twilight was good until it good creepy popular but so did the potter series did the cirque de freak sereies are they really popular?

[xTeamDimitrix] wrote:

Lol i know... twilight was good until it good creepy popular, but so did the potter series! Did the cirque de freak series get really popular?

If the C.D.F series got famous, i'm proud to say they generated less ass-heads than the Potter-world + twilight zone had, combined, which is something, because even the ass-hats among the Potter-Fans actually know what the hell they're talking about, somewhat, but the asshats and most of the so-called brains, on the other hand?Nope...they're even dumber than the Vampire Academy fans, who have less brains than the Potter-World, who almosthave as much brains as the fans of The Dark Is Rising and Percy Jackson And The Olympians series, for that matter!

Lol yeah true actually people told me that they thougth new moon sucked and stuff im like oh wow i actually thought it was better than twilght?

[xTeamDimitrix] wrote:

Lol yeah true actually people told me that they thougth new moon sucked and stuff im like oh wow i actually thought it was better than twilght?

I think they were talking novel-wise, in which case they are half-right about that, really, while the other half, as in movie-wise, it's the other way around.

Like i said, i just hope that if we do end up generating Ass-Hats, that at least they're more Bad-Assed than the epic win of Bad-Assery that was the Potter-World Fan-base, and the fail that the twilight fan-base has become infested with.

i know then again i think if something is really popular there always has to be a fan base there but it would be nice if it wasnt so crazy altho the lightning theif looks good.

[xTeamDimitrix] wrote:

i know then again i think if something is really popular there always has to be an extended fan base there but it would be nice if they weren't so crazy although the lightning thief looks good.

That said, at least we'd just have to worry about people so full of Monster Energy Drinks, that they can't think clearly, at all.Putting up with A.D.H.D fans might be understandable, though.

haha true everyone going crazy over edward cullen but i don't blame then for jacob black tho hehe..

At any rate, we need better storylines with actually good role-models, for once!Which The Lightning Thief is meant to start the trend!

i know instead of girls drooling over sparkly vampires.

[xTeamDimitrix] wrote:

i know instead of girls drooling over sparkly vampires.

Not to mention Jumping Off Cliffs exceeding the 40+ Feet Mark, because if the fall were 36 feet high, an Athlete could make it far and survive, but you manage to go farther than that mark, without the excuse of being a child of the Olympian Sea God, then you're done!No questions asked!!!

and having a strong muscular guys save u all the time and being recless that why rose is a better ro model she actually shows women have diginity and don't need a guy to feel good.

[xTeamDimitrix] wrote:

and having strong muscular guys save you all the time and being reckless, that's why rose is a better role-model! she actually shows women have diginity and don't need a guy to feel good.

The only ones whom i recalled had gotten away with being Reckless, were the likes of Luke Skywalker[The Star Wars Series!], James Tiberius Kirk[Star Trek!], John Connor[The Terminator series!], Harry James Potter[The Harry Potter Septimology!]Eragon Shadeslayer[The Inheritance Cycle!] and Perseus[Percy!] Jackson[The Percy Jackson And The Olympians series!] because not only would their justifications would be there at all, but in most of their cases, its blindingly obvious all over the pages and Cinematic Scenery!!!!

All their worlds and Galaxies managed to make their reasonable justifications obvious enough to work, too, as at least they were powered mainly by awesome, that it just works.What's more, is that they actually make their justifications obvious in ways that Vampire Academy should have pulled off, right from the start!

As much as i appreciate Rose's rebelliousness, it was rather heavy-handed in Book 01, or else her Kindergarden Teacher would have turned out to be a Strigoi in disguise, before she accused the teacher of being a Fascist Bastard.That said, that's one of the reasons why i feel Rose is less hypocritical than Anita Blake could be.Another reason, was that Rose has a Code Of Duty she was prepared to stick with, right to the end, that Bella and Anita may be failing to follow!Third, Vampire Academy's means of ressurection makes more sense than Anita Blake's methods, even though Vampire Academy's reasons for the heavy-duty Vampire Mating Makes so much less sense than Anita Blake's world!

Tonystark616 wrote:

[xTeamDimitrix] wrote:

and having strong muscular guys save you all the time and being reckless, that's why rose is a better role-model! she actually shows women have diginity and don't need a guy to feel good.

The only ones whom i recalled had gotten away with being Reckless, were the likes of Luke Skywalker[The Star Wars Series!], James Tiberius Kirk[Star Trek!], John Connor[The Terminator series!], Harry James Potter[The Harry Potter Septimology!]Eragon Shadeslayer[The Inheritance Cycle!] and Perseus[Percy!] Jackson[The Percy Jackson And The Olympians series!] because not only would their justifications would be there at all, but in most of their cases, its blindingly obvious all over the pages and Cinematic Scenery!!!!

All their worlds and Galaxies managed to make their reasonable justifications obvious enough to work, too, as at least they were powered mainly by awesome, that it just works.What's more, is that they actually make their justifications obvious in ways that Vampire Academy should have pulled off, right from the start!

As much as i appreciate Rose's rebelliousness, it was rather heavy-handed in Book 01, or else her Kindergarden Teacher would have turned out to be a Strigoi in disguise, before she accused the teacher of being a Fascist Bastard.That said, that's one of the reasons why i feel Rose is less hypocritical than Anita Blake could be.Another reason, was that Rose has a Code Of Duty she was prepared to stick with, right to the end, that Bella and Anita may be failing to follow!Third, Vampire Academy's means of ressurection makes more sense than Anita Blake's methods, even though Vampire Academy's reasons for the heavy-duty Vampire Mating Makes so much less sense than Anita Blake's world!

agreed, well yeah becuase rose shows that women can fight for what they believe as bella *needs* edward to live. which in reality you can live without a guy or girl at least some people can, not all girls need a guy to prove themselves anything i mean yeah rose loved dimitri and would do anything but at the same time she's 100 percent dedicated to lissa and gonna protect her and kick anyboys ass who gets in her way.

[xTeamDimitrix] wrote:

Tonystark616 wrote:

[xTeamDimitrix] wrote:

and having strong muscular guys save you all the time and being reckless, that's why rose is a better role-model! she actually shows women have diginity and don't need a guy to feel good.

The only ones whom i recalled had gotten away with being Reckless, were the likes of Luke Skywalker[The Star Wars Series!], James Tiberius Kirk[Star Trek!], John Connor[The Terminator series!], Harry James Potter[The Harry Potter Septimology!]Eragon Shadeslayer[The Inheritance Cycle!] and Perseus[Percy!] Jackson[The Percy Jackson And The Olympians series!] because not only would their justifications would be there at all, but in most of their cases, its blindingly obvious all over the pages and Cinematic Scenery!!!!

All their worlds and Galaxies managed to make their reasonable justifications obvious enough to work, too, as at least they were powered mainly by awesome, that it just works.What's more, is that they actually make their justifications obvious in ways that Vampire Academy should have pulled off, right from the start!

As much as i appreciate Rose's rebelliousness, it was rather heavy-handed in Book 01, or else her Kindergarden Teacher would have turned out to be a Strigoi in disguise, before she accused the teacher of being a Fascist Bastard.That said, that's one of the reasons why i feel Rose is less hypocritical than Anita Blake could be.Another reason, was that Rose has a Code Of Duty she was prepared to stick with, right to the end, that Bella and Anita may be failing to follow!Third, Vampire Academy's means of ressurection makes more sense than Anita Blake's methods, even though Vampire Academy's reasons for the heavy-duty Vampire Mating Makes so much less sense than Anita Blake's world!

agreed, well yeah becuase rose shows that women can fight for what they believe as bella *needs* edward to live. which in reality you can live without a guy or girl at least some people can, not all girls need a guy to prove themselves anything i mean yeah rose loved dimitri and would do anything but at the same time she's 100 percent dedicated to lissa and gonna protect her and kick anyboys ass who gets in her way.

Not to mention Rose isn't heavily dependent on mating, alone, just to gain more powers, for that matter, which i suspect Anita Blake might be doing, lately, from what i heard on the net.

I just wish that Vampire Academy's mating made more sense than Anita Blake's world does, instead of just less sense than Cirque Du Freak's hinted mating, for that matter.

yeah but then again i guess its different for every book.

[xTeamDimitrix] wrote:

yeah but then again i guess its different for every book.

The Ressurection Scenarios might make better sense than some other worlds' attempts at doing so, for some series, Vamp-Induced Series included, yet you could never say the same for their mating or the justifications behind the mating[apart from Vampire Academy's case of needing Half-Mortal Warriors and Soldiers?]that is?

yeah...well VA, has a bit more action then romacne but enough romance, if you look at harry potter thats more of a action book than romance all depends on teh sereis.